From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] ax25: Fix ax25_cb refcounting in ax25_ctl_ioctl Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:02:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20090927190208.GA3549@del.dom.local> References: <20090921201157.GA5460@del.dom.local> <4ABA9058.3010605@free.fr> <20090925131038.GA14778@ff.dom.local> <20090925134052.GA1661@linux-mips.org> <20090925183504.GA3307@del.dom.local> <20090927072319.GA28089@linux-mips.org> <20090927171029.GA3297@del.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , Bernard Pidoux F6BVP , Bernard Pidoux , Linux Netdev List , linux-hams To: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:4657 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330AbZI0TDI (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:03:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090927171029.GA3297@del.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 07:10:29PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > In this case valid calls (return 0) were affected too, so I guess the > whole thing is rarely used. And, after all, there would be only a little, invisible memory leak. Jarek P.