From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] bonding: send ARP requests on interfaces other than the primary for tlb/alb Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:40:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20090930054015.GA5231@ff.dom.local> References: <4AC2EA97.5010809@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller , Andy Gospodarek To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:3153 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752273AbZI3FkS (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:40:18 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so1999829fge.1 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AC2EA97.5010809@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 30-09-2009 07:20, Eric Dumazet wrote: ... >> + /* Choose an output channel for the ARP frame */ >> + tx_slave = rlb_choose_channel(skb, bond); >> >> - /* The ARP relpy packets must be delayed so that >> - * they can cancel out the influence of the ARP request. >> - */ > > COmments should have the following form : > /* > * This is a fine comment > */ It's "The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments [...]". Jarek P.