From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc1] net: VMware virtual Ethernet NIC driver: vmxnet3 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:39:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20090930173923.4520716a@s6510> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel , netdev , Stephen Hemminger , "David S. Miller" , Jeff Garzik , Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , virtualization , pv-drivers To: Shreyas Bhatewara Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Shreyas Bhatewara wrote: Note: your patch was linewrapped again > + > + > +static void > +vmxnet3_declare_features(struct vmxnet3_adapter *adapter, bool dma64) > +{ > + struct net_device *netdev = adapter->netdev; > + > + netdev->features = NETIF_F_SG | > + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX | > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX | > + NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER | > + NETIF_F_TSO | > + NETIF_F_TSO6; > + > + printk(KERN_INFO "features: sg csum vlan jf tso tsoIPv6"); > + > + adapter->rxcsum = true; > + adapter->jumbo_frame = true; > + > + if (!disable_lro) { > + adapter->lro = true; > + printk(" lro"); > + } Why not use NETIF_F_LRO and ethtool to control LRO support?