From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate estimators
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:37:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001.123725.02194664.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC4FE07.5070204@gmail.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:07:51 +0200
> We currently send TCA_STATS_RATE_EST elements to netlink users, even if no estimator
> is running.
>
> # tc -s -d qdisc
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 112833764978 bytes 1495081739 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> User has no way to tell if the "rate 0bit 0pps" is a real estimation, or a fake
> one (because no estimator is active)
>
> After this patch, tc command output is :
> $ tc -s -d qdisc
> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
> Sent 561075 bytes 1196 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
I'm generally fine with this idea.
The new behavior is certainly more intuitive even to me :-)
Unless there are other objections I'm ok with this and I'll apply
your final version when I start taking changes for net-next-2.6
(which is probably right after -rc3 is released).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 19:07 [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate estimators Eric Dumazet
2009-10-01 19:37 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-10-01 21:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-01 21:14 ` David Miller
2009-10-01 21:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 7:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 7:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-02 7:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 7:32 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 10:35 ` [RFC take2] " Eric Dumazet
2009-10-02 11:25 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 12:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-02 20:11 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-02 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-07 8:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091001.123725.02194664.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).