From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] make TLLAO option for NA packets configurable Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:53:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20091002105351.0fbde9c2@nehalam> References: <20091001111450.221969cc@s6510> <20091001115611.0baa77b8@s6510> <20091001.123740.103898742.davem@davemloft.net> <200910020119.47320.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , cratiu@ixiacom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Octavian Purdila Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:34996 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756561AbZJBRxx (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:53:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200910020119.47320.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 01:19:47 +0300 Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Thursday 01 October 2009 22:37:40 you wrote: > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:56:11 -0700 > > > > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:39:32 +0300 > > > > > > Octavian Purdila wrote: > > >> On Thursday 01 October 2009 21:14:50 you wrote: > > >> > Probably this should be a per interface property rather than per > > >> > namespace. > > >> > > >> In our case, where we have lots of interfaces active, it would be nice > > >> to have the per namespace property as well. > > > > > > The ipv6 control infrastructure already has that option. If you changed > > > your patch to use a per-interface control then there would be: > > > > > > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/force_tllao > > > > Right, this would work a lot better. > > > > Here is v3 which also updates Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt. > > Thanks, > tavi > > This is good although I would have shortened the name. --