netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jérôme Pouiller" <jezz@sysmic.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 17:15:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910071715.57249.jezz@sysmic.org> (raw)

Dear,

I have a problem with commit 8bc487d150b939e69830c39322df4ee486efe381 
in file drivers/of/of_mdio.c in function of_phy_find_device.

As you see, this function define match() as a nested function. My 
compiler (powerpc-e500-linux-gnu-gcc-3.4.1) raise an error during link 
due to this nested definition:
  drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x5e2a4): In function `of_phy_find_device': /home/jezz/linux-next/drivers/of/of_mdio.c:107: 
undefined reference to `__trampoline_setup'

I am sure I could solve problem by rebuilding my toolchain. 
Nevertheless, I think nested function definition is not perfectly 
supported by all compilers. Also, I suggest to place function match() 
outside of scope of of_phy_find_device as in following patch.

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
index bacaa53..c7b2e26 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
@@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int of_mdiobus_register(struct mii_bus *mdio, struct device_node *np)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register);

+static int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np)
+{
+       return dev_archdata_get_node(&dev->archdata) == phy_np;
+}
 /**
  * of_phy_find_device - Give a PHY node, find the phy_device
  * @phy_np: Pointer to the phy's device tree node
@@ -106,11 +110,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_mdiobus_register);
 struct phy_device *of_phy_find_device(struct device_node *phy_np)
 {
        struct device *d;
-       int match(struct device *dev, void *phy_np)
-       {
-               return dev_archdata_get_node(&dev->archdata) == phy_np;
-       }
-
        if (!phy_np)
                return NULL;


What do you think about it?

Best regards,

-- 
Jérôme Pouiller (jezz AT sysmic DOT org)

             reply	other threads:[~2009-10-07 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-07 15:15 Jérôme Pouiller [this message]
2009-10-07 16:11 ` Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c Grant Likely
2009-10-07 16:23   ` vb
2009-10-08  8:45     ` Jérôme Pouiller
2009-10-08 11:14       ` Gabriel Paubert
2009-10-08  8:34   ` [PATCH] Remove nested function Jérôme Pouiller
2009-10-08  9:10     ` David Miller
     [not found] <200910071629.15804.jezz@sysmic.org>
2009-10-07 14:55 ` Nested function in drivers/of/of_mdio.c Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910071715.57249.jezz@sysmic.org \
    --to=jezz@sysmic.org \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).