From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] multiqueue changes
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091008125325.GA9164@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ACDD762.9080101@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:13:22PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 09:03:44AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > ...
> >> num_tx_queues. But it seems we should rather use more often
> >> real_num_tx_queue in schedulers code like dumps and maybe more
> >> (like e.g. sch_multiq does).
> >
> > ...i.e. probably everywhere between dev_activate and dev_deactivate
> > all qdisc operations could use real_num_tx_queues (including a test
> > like: netif_is_real_multique), unless I miss something.
>
> I am not sure David intent was being able to dynamically adjust real_num_tx_queue
> between 1 and num_tx_queue.
If so, then it looks like some drivers could misuse this intent.
Thanks for the explanation,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-08 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-08 7:18 [RFC] multiqueue changes Eric Dumazet
2009-10-08 9:03 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-08 12:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-08 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-08 12:53 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-10-09 7:58 ` David Miller
2009-10-28 17:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-28 21:23 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-29 16:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-29 21:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-29 22:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-10-30 10:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-31 17:25 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-01 13:20 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 11:35 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 12:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 12:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 13:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-02 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-02 13:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 14:10 ` [PATCH] net: Introduce realloc_netdev_mq() Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 16:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 16:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 17:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 19:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 20:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 21:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 21:31 ` David Miller
2009-12-03 21:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 21:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-03 23:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-04 7:48 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 10:51 ` Peter P Waskiewicz Jr
2009-12-04 11:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 13:01 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-04 13:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-16 22:50 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-17 0:36 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-17 16:56 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-17 22:57 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-01-18 18:29 ` Michael Chan
2010-01-18 19:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-09 8:51 ` [RFC] multiqueue changes Jarek Poplawski
2009-10-09 9:40 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091008125325.GA9164@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).