From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 4/4] TCPCT part 1: initial SYN exchange
 with SYNACK data
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20091014.231710.63386795.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4AD6B3E8.2050904@gmail.com>
	<4AD6B467.2080701@gmail.com>
	<4AD6B4F0.8060709@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: william.allen.simpson@gmail.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48695
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753835AbZJOGRN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:17:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4AD6B4F0.8060709@gmail.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


When posting a patch series like this, use different subject
lines in each patch.

The subject line becomes the commit message header, and if
they are all the same nobody can figure out the general
idea of each part of the patch series when scanning the
commit header lines.