From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH -next] vmxnet3: use dev_dbg, fix build for CONFIG_BLOCK=n Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:47:48 -0700 Message-ID: <200910151547.48247.dtor@vmware.com> References: <20091015152538.74a1cb15.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <8B1F619C9F5F454E81D90D3C161698D7017DD56435@EXCH-MBX-3.vmware.com> <4AD7A569.1040308@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Dunlap , Bhavesh Davda , Stephen Rothwell , netdev , LKML , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , David Miller To: pv-drivers@vmware.com Return-path: Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com ([65.115.85.69]:54106 "EHLO smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763196AbZJOWsZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:48:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4AD7A569.1040308@oracle.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Randy, On Thursday 15 October 2009 03:42:49 pm Randy Dunlap wrote: > Bhavesh Davda wrote: > > Who ever compiles with CONFIG_BLOCK=n? Just kidding... > > or why does networking need CONFIG_BLOCK at all? ;) > > > Thanks again for making this change! Ship it! > > So could I have used adapter->netdev->dev or adapter->pdev->dev ? > either of them? are they the same? > They are the same. -- Dmitry