Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@qlogic.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:22:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091017022210.GA14919@linux-ox1b.qlogic.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091016.175142.52482970.davem@davemloft.net>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 05:51:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@qlogic.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:15:33 -0700
> 
> > These patches are interdependent.
> 
> No, Ron, they are absolutely not.
> 
> Apply the first patch, and that breaks the build because
> you've removed LARGE_BUFFER_SIZE but it's still referenced
> in qlge_main.c, and there are tons of other breakages too.
> 
> Don't send me garbage like this and then claim it's a set
> of independent patches.  A trivial build test would have
> shown otherwise, but you obviously didn't do that.
> 
> This is completely rediculious:

Hi Dave,

Sorry for the confusion.  I said they were 'interdependent' patches, meaning
"depending on each other".  I was trying to break this up to
make it easier to review.  Shall I send it as a single patch?

Thanks,
Ron



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-17  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-16 20:15 [net-next PATCH 0/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU Ron Mercer
2009-10-16 20:15 ` [net-next PATCH 1/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU (header changes) Ron Mercer
2009-10-16 20:15 ` [net-next PATCH 2/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU (Add API) Ron Mercer
2009-10-16 20:15 ` [net-next PATCH 3/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU changes Ron Mercer
2009-10-17  0:51 ` [net-next PATCH 0/3] qlge: Size RX buffers based on MTU David Miller
2009-10-17  2:22   ` Ron Mercer [this message]
2009-10-17 22:37     ` David Miller
2009-10-19 13:29       ` Ron Mercer
2009-10-19 13:32         ` [net-next PATCH 1/1] " Ron Mercer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091017022210.GA14919@linux-ox1b.qlogic.org \
    --to=ron.mercer@qlogic.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox