From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] AF_UNIX: Fix deadlock on connecting to shutdown socket Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:07:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20091019180712.GA2959@ami.dom.local> References: <4ADC010C.5070809@hitachi.com> <20091019115713.GB6869@ff.dom.local> <20091019.061459.193694892.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tomoki.sekiyama.qu@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com, hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, hideo.aoki.tk@hitachi.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]:51226 "EHLO mail-fx0-f218.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754781AbZJSSH0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:07:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091019.061459.193694892.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:14:59AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarek Poplawski > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:57:13 +0000 > > > Isn't the shutdown call expected to change sk_state to TCP_CLOSE? > > No, because the send side is still up and operational, it's > only a half duplex close. OK, thanks for the explanation, Jarek P.