From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@gmail.com>,
Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
mostrows@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:57:40 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091019205740.GD5233@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADCB3A4.8060408@gmail.com>
[Eric Dumazet - Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 08:44:52PM +0200]
...
|
| There is still a race here, since you do a dev_put(po->ppoe_dev); without any lock held
|
| So pppoe_flush_dev() can run concurently and dev_put(po->ppoe_dev) at same time.
|
| In fact pppoe_flush_dev() can change po->ppoe_dev anytime, so you should check
| all occurences of po->ppoe_dev use in the code and check if appropriate locking is done.
|
| pppoe_rcv_core() is not safe
| pppoe_ioctl() is not safe
| pppoe_sendmsg() is not safe
| __pppoe_xmit() is not safe
|
Eric, Michal, please take a look (compile-test only).
There is still unclear moment for NETDEV_CHANGEMTU
since one could be doing this in say endless loop from
userspace calling device to flush all the time which
implies dev_put as a result :(
Comments are welcome (and complains as well). I'll be able to
continue handling (or reply to mail) tomorrow evening only.
Anyway -- this patch is ugly enough but may happen to work.
-- Cyrill
---
drivers/net/pppoe.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.git/drivers/net/pppoe.c
=====================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/drivers/net/pppoe.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/drivers/net/pppoe.c
@@ -386,14 +386,19 @@ static struct notifier_block pppoe_notif
static int pppoe_rcv_core(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
- struct pppox_sock *relay_po;
+ struct pppox_sock *relay_po = NULL;
+ struct net *net = NULL;
if (sk->sk_state & PPPOX_BOUND) {
ppp_input(&po->chan, skb);
} else if (sk->sk_state & PPPOX_RELAY) {
- relay_po = get_item_by_addr(dev_net(po->pppoe_dev),
- &po->pppoe_relay);
- if (relay_po == NULL)
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
+ if (po->pppoe_dev)
+ net = dev_net(po->pppoe_dev);
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
+ if (net)
+ relay_po = get_item_by_addr(net, &po->pppoe_relay);
+ if (!net || !relay_po)
goto abort_kfree;
if ((sk_pppox(relay_po)->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED) == 0)
@@ -652,12 +657,15 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *
/* Delete the old binding */
if (stage_session(po->pppoe_pa.sid)) {
pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
if (po->pppoe_dev) {
pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(po->pppoe_dev));
delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid,
po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
+ po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
}
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
memset(sk_pppox(po) + 1, 0,
sizeof(struct pppox_sock) - sizeof(struct sock));
sk->sk_state = PPPOX_NONE;
@@ -670,7 +678,9 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *
if (!dev)
goto end;
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
po->pppoe_dev = dev;
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
po->pppoe_ifindex = dev->ifindex;
pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev));
write_lock_bh(&pn->hash_lock);
@@ -708,10 +718,12 @@ end:
release_sock(sk);
return error;
err_put:
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
if (po->pppoe_dev) {
dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
}
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
goto end;
}
@@ -738,6 +750,7 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
+ unsigned int mtu = 0;
int val;
int err;
@@ -746,11 +759,19 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
err = -ENXIO;
if (!(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
break;
-
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&flush_lock))
+ break;
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ if (po->pppoe_dev) {
+ mtu = po->pppoe_dev->mtu;
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
+ if (err)
+ break;
err = -EFAULT;
- if (put_user(po->pppoe_dev->mtu -
- sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) -
- PPP_HDRLEN,
+ if (put_user(mtu - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) - PPP_HDRLEN,
(int __user *)arg))
break;
err = 0;
@@ -760,14 +781,22 @@ static int pppoe_ioctl(struct socket *so
err = -ENXIO;
if (!(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
break;
-
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ if (!spin_trylock(&flush_lock))
+ break;
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ if (po->pppoe_dev) {
+ mtu = po->pppoe_dev->mtu;
+ err = 0;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
+ if (err)
+ break;
err = -EFAULT;
if (get_user(val, (int __user *)arg))
break;
- if (val < (po->pppoe_dev->mtu
- - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr)
- - PPP_HDRLEN))
+ if (val < (mtu - sizeof(struct pppoe_hdr) - PPP_HDRLEN))
err = 0;
else
err = -EINVAL;
@@ -842,7 +871,7 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
int error;
struct pppoe_hdr hdr;
struct pppoe_hdr *ph;
- struct net_device *dev;
+ struct net_device *dev = NULL;
char *start;
lock_sock(sk);
@@ -856,7 +885,15 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
hdr.code = 0;
hdr.sid = po->num;
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
dev = po->pppoe_dev;
+ if (!dev) {
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
+ error = -ENODEV;
+ goto end;
+ }
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
error = -EMSGSIZE;
if (total_len > (dev->mtu + dev->hard_header_len))
@@ -899,6 +936,8 @@ static int pppoe_sendmsg(struct kiocb *i
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
end:
+ if (dev)
+ dev_put(dev);
release_sock(sk);
return error;
}
@@ -911,15 +950,19 @@ end:
static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
- struct net_device *dev = po->pppoe_dev;
+ struct net_device *dev;
struct pppoe_hdr *ph;
int data_len = skb->len;
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) || !(sk->sk_state & PPPOX_CONNECTED))
goto abort;
- if (!dev)
- goto abort;
+ spin_lock(&flush_lock);
+ if (!po->pppoe_dev)
+ goto abort_unlock;
+ dev = po->pppoe_dev;
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
/* Copy the data if there is no space for the header or if it's
* read-only.
@@ -942,11 +985,13 @@ static int __pppoe_xmit(struct sock *sk,
dev_hard_header(skb, dev, ETH_P_PPP_SES,
po->pppoe_pa.remote, NULL, data_len);
-
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ dev_put(dev);
return 1;
+abort_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&flush_lock);
abort:
kfree_skb(skb);
return 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-19 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-18 21:02 kernel panic in latest vanilla stable, while using nameif with "alive" pppoe interfaces Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 3:34 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 11:36 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 12:01 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-19 12:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 13:19 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 15:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 16:05 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 17:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 18:07 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-19 18:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-19 19:29 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 20:54 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-20 3:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 5:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 5:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-20 5:17 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 6:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-19 20:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-10-19 21:22 ` Michal Ostrowski
2009-10-20 0:08 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 3:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 11:36 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 11:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 11:52 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 13:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 13:50 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 13:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 14:20 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 14:23 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-20 19:08 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-23 15:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-25 18:10 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-10-20 2:28 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091019205740.GD5233@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mostrows@earthlink.net \
--cc=mostrows@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).