From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-next-2.6] netdev: better dev_name_hash
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091025224153.GB20987@nuttenaction> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910252355.32640.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
* Octavian Purdila | 2009-10-25 23:55:32 [+0200]:
>My results shows that new17 is better or very close to jhash2. And I think its
>lighter then jhash too.
If new17 is very close to jhash/jhash2 then the cycles comes into play.
Anyway, there is already a very potent hash interface in form of jhash{,2}.
+1 for jhash2
HGN
PS: great work! ;)
PPS: http://libhashish.sourceforge.net/ have some real hash benchmarks in form
of avalanche test and some others too. It does not really matter here because
Jenkins performs _nearly_ perfect in all cases. ;)
--
Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> || http://jauu.net/
Telephone: +49 174 5455209 || Key Id: 0x98350C22
Key Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-25 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-25 19:58 [PATCH next-next-2.6] netdev: better dev_name_hash Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 20:17 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2009-10-25 21:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-25 21:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-25 22:41 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2009-10-25 22:45 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-26 5:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-26 13:07 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-10-26 14:31 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-26 14:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-26 15:52 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-26 16:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-26 17:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 1:24 ` David Miller
2009-10-27 1:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-26 6:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-26 7:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-26 4:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-26 22:36 ` [PATCH] dcache: better name hash function Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>, Al Viro
2009-10-27 2:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-27 3:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 16:38 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091025224153.GB20987@nuttenaction \
--to=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).