From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer Subject: Re: [PATCH next-next-2.6] netdev: better dev_name_hash Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:41:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20091025224153.GB20987@nuttenaction> References: <200910252158.53921.opurdila@ixiacom.com> <4AE4C1FA.7000002@gmail.com> <200910252355.32640.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Octavian Purdila Return-path: Received: from alternativer.internetendpunkt.de ([88.198.24.89]:48107 "EHLO geheimer.internetendpunkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754294AbZJYWlu (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:41:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200910252355.32640.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Octavian Purdila | 2009-10-25 23:55:32 [+0200]: >My results shows that new17 is better or very close to jhash2. And I think its >lighter then jhash too. If new17 is very close to jhash/jhash2 then the cycles comes into play. Anyway, there is already a very potent hash interface in form of jhash{,2}. +1 for jhash2 HGN PS: great work! ;) PPS: http://libhashish.sourceforge.net/ have some real hash benchmarks in form of avalanche test and some others too. It does not really matter here because Jenkins performs _nearly_ perfect in all cases. ;) -- Hagen Paul Pfeifer || http://jauu.net/ Telephone: +49 174 5455209 || Key Id: 0x98350C22 Key Fingerprint: 490F 557B 6C48 6D7E 5706 2EA2 4A22 8D45 9835 0C22