From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, opurdila@ixiacom.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] net: fold network name hash (v2)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:04:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091027150436.56e673cd@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091027102251.244ee681@nehalam>
The full_name_hash does not produce a value that is evenly distributed
over the lower 8 bits. This causes name hash to be unbalanced with large
number of names. There is a standard function to fold in upper bits
so use that.
This is independent of possible improvements to full_name_hash()
in future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
--- a/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 14:54:21.922563076 -0700
+++ b/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 15:04:16.733813459 -0700
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@
#include <linux/socket.h>
#include <linux/sockios.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/if_ether.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
@@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_base_lock);
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_name_hash(struct net *net, const char *name)
{
unsigned hash = full_name_hash(name, strnlen(name, IFNAMSIZ));
- return &net->dev_name_head[hash & ((1 << NETDEV_HASHBITS) - 1)];
+ return &net->dev_name_head[hash_long(hash, NETDEV_HASHBITS)];
}
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_index_hash(struct net *net, int ifindex)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9986527.24561256620662709.JavaMail.root@tahiti.vyatta.com>
2009-10-27 5:19 ` [PATCH] dcache: better name hash function Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 5:24 ` David Miller
2009-10-27 17:22 ` [PATCH] net: fold network name hash Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 18:02 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-10-27 22:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-10-28 6:07 ` [PATCH] net: fold network name hash (v2) Eric Dumazet
2009-10-28 9:28 ` David Miller
2009-10-28 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 6:07 ` [PATCH] dcache: better name hash function Eric Dumazet
2009-10-27 6:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-27 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-27 17:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-27 23:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-27 23:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-28 0:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-28 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-28 1:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
[not found] ` <4AE72B91.7040700@gmail.com>
2009-10-27 17:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091027150436.56e673cd@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).