From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] fsl_pq_mdio: Add Suport for etsec2.0 devices. Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091029.031610.04742718.davem@davemloft.net> References: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B950352@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> <20091029.024546.90958594.davem@davemloft.net> <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B95035E@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com To: B05799@freescale.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40766 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753879AbZJ2KPq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:15:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9F4C7D19E8361D4C94921B95BE08B81B95035E@zin33exm22.fsl.freescale.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Kumar Gopalpet-B05799" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:41:22 +0530 > This is the tree I generated the patches against initially. > The initial set of patches were generated against this tree: > (http://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git) > > Can you please confirm that the above tree is correct. Yes. > The patches sent by me applies cleanly to the above mentioned > net-next-2.6 tree. It may have applied cleanly when you sent them, but by the time I applied them it didn't. Resend a fresh patch set against a fresh net-next-2.6 checkout and let's see what happens :-)