From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gro: Name the GRO result enumeration type Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20091029.212935.225238178.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1256836629.2827.69.camel@achroite> <20091029174811.GA30749@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@solarflare.com To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54754 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752756AbZJ3E3L (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:29:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20091029174811.GA30749@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Herbert Xu Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:48:11 -0400 > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:17:09PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> This clarifies which return and parameter types are GRO result codes >> and not RX result codes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings > > Acked-by: Herbert Xu Applied.