From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:51:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091102085121.7416fa8f@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091102.001710.209808608.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:17:10 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:44:22 -0700
>
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:42 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> The ethtool operation to blink LED can take an indeterminately long time,
> >> blocking out other operations (via rtnl_lock). This patch is an attempt
> >> to work around the problem.
> >>
> >> It does need more discussion, because it will mean that drivers that formerly
> >> were protected from changes during blink aren't. For example, user could
> >> start device blinking, and then plug in cable causing change netlink event
> >> to change state or pull cable and have device come down.
> >
> > Yeah, the biggest concern is shutting down the device while it is still
> > blinking. During shutdown, some devices are brought to low power state
> > and the chip will no longer respond to I/Os to blink the LEDs. On some
> > systems, this can cause bus hang or NMI.
>
> Right, and for this reason we'll either need find some way to stop
> the LED blinking when the device is brought down.
>
> We can deal with this in a way such that we'll never need to bug
> the drivers again if we want to mess with the implementation again.
>
> Create a "netif_phys_id_loop_iter()" that, along with a netdev
> pointer, takes a "u32 data" which is whatever was passed in to
> ethtool_ops->id().
>
> The drivers then structure their loops like:
>
> while (1) {
> blink_it_baby();
> data = netif_phys_id_loop_iter(dev, data);
> if (!data)
> break;
> }
>
> Next, we take that:
>
> if (data == 0)
> data = UINT_MAX / 2;
>
> That every driver seems to do, and stick it in the ethtool op dispatch
> in net/core/ethtool.c so it doesn't need to be duplicated (and
> potentially forgotten) in every implementation.
>
> Finally, in netif_phys_id_loop_iter() we put something like:
>
> u32 netif_phys_id_loop_iter(struct netdev *dev, u32 data)
> {
> if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING)
> return 0;
> if (msleep_interruptible(500))
> return 0;
> return data - 2;
> }
>
> Then, unregister somehow blocks on the ->phys_id() hitting that
> NETREG_UNREGISTERING check and returning.
>
> Anyways, you get the idea.
For compatibility, I was thinking of adding a new ethtool hook that
moves the blinking loop into ethtool.
static int ethtool_phys_blink(struct net_device *dev, u32 secs)
{
while (secs > 0) {
dev->ethtool_ps->phys_led(dev, ETH_LED_ON);
...
dev->ethtool_ps->phys_led(dev, ETH_LED_OFF);
}
dev->ethtool_ops->phys_led(dev, ETH_LED_NORMAL);
}
static int ethtool_phys_id(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
{
struct ethtool_value id;
if (copy_from_user(&id, useraddr, sizeof(id)))
return -EFAULT;
if (dev->ethtool_ops->phys_led)
return ethtool_phys_blink(dev, id.data);
if (dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id)
return dev->ethtool_ops->phys_id(dev, id.data);
else
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-30 17:42 RFC: netdev: allow ethtool physical id to drop rtnl_lock Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-30 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-10-30 18:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-31 16:44 ` Michael Chan
2009-11-02 8:17 ` David Miller
2009-11-02 16:51 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-11-02 18:29 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091102085121.7416fa8f@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).