From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: Avoid rounding errors for 100%.
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:05:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091103100547.0790ed1f@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF06617.6030804@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:19:19 +0100
Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:19:45 +0100
> > Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Although the patch makes sense,
> >> it does not fix the bug/effect we were seeing.
> >> A netem reorder percentage of 100% will still get packets reordered.
> >> (if the netem queue is not empty)
> >>
> >>
> >> hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
> >>> From: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
> >>>
> >>> We noticed that a netem reorder percentage of 100% will still get packets reordered.
> >>> This patch fixes that.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> tc/tc_util.c | 6 ++++--
> >>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tc/tc_util.c b/tc/tc_util.c
> >>> index fe2c7eb..2641f2e 100644
> >>> --- a/tc/tc_util.c
> >>> +++ b/tc/tc_util.c
> >>> @@ -363,8 +363,10 @@ int get_percent(__u32 *percent, const char *str)
> >>> return -1;
> >>> if (*p && strcmp(p, "%"))
> >>> return -1;
> >>> -
> >>> - *percent = (unsigned) rint(per * max_percent_value);
> >>> + if (per == 1.)
> >>> + *percent = max_percent_value;
> >>> + else
> >>> + *percent = (unsigned) rint(per * max_percent_value);
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > If you don't want reordering, don't specify reordering?
>
> Are you arguing against the correctness of my patch?
>
> Regarding, the reordering thingy/bug/effect whatever:
> We would like to specify reordering with something like this:
> Please delay 1% of the packets with 5ms.
>
> We thought that would be possible with
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 5m reorder 99%
>
> But unfortunately it is not. Any better idea?
>
I think the problem isn't in iproute utilities but in the code inside
netem kernel module.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 15:38 [PATCH] iproute2: Avoid rounding errors for 100% hannemann
2009-11-03 16:19 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-11-03 17:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-03 17:19 ` Arnd Hannemann
2009-11-03 18:05 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091103100547.0790ed1f@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).