Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE

[Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>]

On 03-11-2009 11:13, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote:
>> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change,
>> especially this part:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=124453482324409&w=2
>>
>> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure
>> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better
>> tool...
> 
> These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel?
> 
> As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by 
> correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to
> correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal 
> has forgotten.
> It is possible to receive once again full ???°N~?N~?N~???N~? for the test?

There were a few iproute changes, tested enough I guess. Alas, I
didn't keep them (they could be found around with link above).

But it's not about your testing. I meant: since nobody noticed
something was (still) wrong with 1G scheduling, why bother with 10G?

Best regards,
Jarek P.

PS: ...and don't remove me from CC, please ;-)