From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: HTB accuracy on 10GbE Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:54:13 +0000 Message-ID: <20091103105413.GD6718@ff.dom.local> References: <4AF0023C.5010404@bigtelecom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Patrick McHardy , Linux Netdev List To: Badalian Vyacheslav Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:63479 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbZKCKyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:54:13 -0500 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so7422626bwz.21 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:54:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF0023C.5010404@bigtelecom.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03-11-2009 11:13, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: >> Really?! As a matter of fact there isn't fully used the last change, >> especially this part: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-netdev&m=3D124453482324409&w=3D2 >> >> And nobody even noticed it for quite a long time. I'm not even sure >> Ryousei needs this now for anything but comparing with some better >> tool... >=20 > These changes have not been tested and applied to kernel? >=20 > As I now remember, I promised to test this patch and judging by=20 > correspondence so it and have not made. My error - I am ready to > correct it. Probably there were difficulties, and is then banal=20 > has forgotten. > It is possible to receive once again full ???=B0N~?N~?N~???N~? for th= e test? There were a few iproute changes, tested enough I guess. Alas, I didn't keep them (they could be found around with link above). But it's not about your testing. I meant: since nobody noticed something was (still) wrong with 1G scheduling, why bother with 10G? Best regards, Jarek P. PS: ...and don't remove me from CC, please ;-)