From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:04:51 +0100
Message-ID: <200911032204.51085.bzolnier@gmail.com>
References: <1256886023.3555.5.camel@johannes.local> <200911032059.23409.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200911032132.31533.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1755035AbZKCVHO@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200911032132.31533.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:32:30 Ivo van Doorn wrote:

> > rt2800pci patch itself has been getting dust in your tree since at least
> > April (it hasn't received any bigger updates since then)..
> 
> And how many times do I have to repeat the reason?
> I think that after dozens of mails, the message should have been clear, especially
> to somebody who apparently has been monitoring and worrying about the development
> process for the last 2 years....

Just for the record:

I got only interested in rt2x00 support around April this year (while I was
doing major staging cleanups everywhere) and I was hearing back then that
rt2800pci will be merged "really soon" and that the project is making "great
progress"..

-- 
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz