From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>, devik@cdi.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sch_htb.c consume the classes's tokens bellow the HTB_CAN_SEND level
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:11:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091104121146.GA8578@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412e6f7f0911040401g5a8d58b0yc8c1637d419094f2@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:01:23PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:21:48PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think so. Although a class's tokens may be negative, but its
> >> ctokens may be positive. Charging its tokens is to prevent its cmode
> >> from being changed to HTB_CAN_SEND from HTB_CANT_SEND directly.
> >
> > I think, you should really better show some tests proving your patch
> > is needed and doesn't affect a case I described, instead of trying to
> > discuss the meaninig of all HTB variables here.
> >
>
> I test it before sending it here, but it doesn't show any obvious
> difference as Martin said, no worse and no better.
Strange... How this patch could be needed or even "necessary", and
do "no worse and no better" at the same time.
> I don't know how to
> construct a test to show you the bad effect you worry about. Any
> suggestion about the test?
E.g. something like I described, but only rates 50kbit and 100kbit
instead of 5 and 10 packets/sec.
Regards,
Jarek P.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 2:41 [PATCH] sch_htb.c consume the classes's tokens bellow the HTB_CAN_SEND level Changli Gao
2009-11-03 8:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-03 9:47 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-03 10:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-03 13:18 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-03 23:00 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-04 1:53 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-04 9:16 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 10:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-04 10:58 ` Martin Devera
2009-11-04 11:30 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 11:51 ` Martin Devera
2009-11-04 11:58 ` Martin Devera
2009-11-04 12:08 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 12:15 ` Martin Devera
2009-11-05 5:44 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 11:21 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 11:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-11-04 12:01 ` Changli Gao
2009-11-04 12:11 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091104121146.GA8578@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).