From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: drop capability from protocol definitions Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:07:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091105.210758.191587916.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20091104163211.27133.74927.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20091104173104.GF2603@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: eparis@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, dwalsh@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org To: acme@infradead.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52468 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbZKFFHd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:07:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091104173104.GF2603@ghostprotocols.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:31:04 -0200 > Em Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Eric Paris escreveu: >> struct can_proto had a capability field which wasn't ever used. It is dropped >> entirely. >> >> struct inet_protosw had a capability field which can be more clearly expressed >> in the code by just checking if sock->type = SOCK_RAW. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris > > Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Applied to net-next-2.6