From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 net-next-2.6] udp: optimisations Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:55:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091108.205522.185944441.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4AF72738.7020606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, lgrijincu@ixiacom.com, opurdila@ixiacom.com To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50238 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752562AbZKIEy5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:54:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4AF72738.7020606@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:16:56 +0100 > This patch series address UDP scalability problems, we failed to solve in 2007 > (commit 6aaf47fa48d3c44 INET : IPV4 UDP lookups converted to a 2 pass algo) > we had to revert a bit later. Looks great, all applied, thanks Eric. I would even go so far as to say that the cutoff to the second hash table should be even lower than 10, like maybe 4 or 5.