From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:06:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911081306.20201.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m14op5jjo4.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
On Sunday 08 November 2009 12:16:43 Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> This patchset reimplements sys_sysctl as a compatibility wrapper
> around /proc/sys. After which it removes all of the code to all over
> the kernel that is used today to implement the binary sysctls.
>
> I am posting this patchset to give everyone a heads up what is in
> flight.
>
> I intend to carry all of these patches in my sysctl tree.
Very nice patches again!
Looking at what you did, I had two ideas how to move on from there,
which may be part of your plans already:
1. Make it possible to build sysctl_binary.c as a loadable module
so you can get a smaller kernel without losing the option to use
binary sysctl altogether. This of course requires a small portion
to remain in the kernel, to provide the actual syscall entry point
and load the module on demand.
2. On top of that, put the same code into glibc so that you don't
even have to load the module when you're running a new glibc version.
Since the binary sysctl ABI is stable (as in stiff and dead), there
should be no need to synchronize any extensions to it betwen kernel
and libc.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-08 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 12:16 [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 09/23] sysctl net: Remove unused binary sysctl code Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-11-09 3:44 ` [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-08 12:20 Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:15 Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911081306.20201.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).