From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, ecashin@coraid.com,
harvey.harrison@gmail.com, bzolnier@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] AOE: use rcu to find network device
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:06:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091110150617.0e6920f0@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ffe0a1df67d13a45a413f40d00dd80a@coraid.com>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:01:49 -0500
Ed Cashin <ecashin@coraid.com> wrote:
> On Tue Nov 10 13:07:37 EST 2009, shemminger@vyatta.com wrote:
> > This gets rid of another use of read_lock(&dev_base_lock) by using
> > RCU. Also, it only increments the reference count of the device actually
> > used rather than holding and releasing every device
> >
> > Compile tested only.
>
> This function runs once a minute when the aoe driver is loaded,
> if you'd like to test it a bit more.
>
> It looks like there's no dev_put corresponding to the dev_hold
> after the changes.
>
Hmm, looks like AOE actually is not ref counting the network device.
So my patch is incorrect.
As it stands (before my patch), it is UNSAFE. It can decide to queue
packets to a device that is removed out from underneath it causing
reference to freed memory.
Moving the rcu_read_lock up to aoecmd_cfg() would solve that but the
whole driver appears to be unsafe about device refcounting and handling
device removal properly.
It needs to:
1. Get a device ref count when it remembers a device: (ie addif)
2. Install a notifier that looks for device removal events
3. In notifier, remove interface, including flushing all pending
skb's for that device.
This obviously is beyond the scope of the RCU stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-10 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 17:54 [PATCH 00/10] netdev: get rid of read_lock(&dev_base_lock) usages Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] netdev: add netdev_continue_rcu Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:47 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] vlan: eliminate use of dev_base_lock Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:47 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] net: use rcu for network scheduler API Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:47 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] AOE: use rcu to find network device Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-10 20:01 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-10 23:06 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-11-10 23:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-11 6:48 ` David Miller
2009-11-12 14:33 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-12 17:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-12 18:07 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-12 19:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-18 16:49 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-11 14:22 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-13 21:39 ` Ed Cashin
2009-11-13 22:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] parisc: use RCU " Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:48 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] s390: use RCU to walk list of network devices Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-10 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:49 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] decnet: use RCU to find " Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-10 18:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:24 ` steve
2009-11-11 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] decnet: add RTNL lock when reading address list Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-11 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] decnet: convert dndev_lock to spinlock Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-12 3:56 ` David Miller
2009-11-12 3:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] decnet: add RTNL lock when reading address list David Miller
2009-11-10 19:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] decnet: use RCU to find network devices Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:49 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] ipv6: use RCU to walk list of " Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-11 6:50 ` David Miller
2009-11-12 3:34 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 4:39 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] IPV4: use rcu to walk list of devices in IGMP Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 6:50 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 17:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] CAN: use dev_get_by_index_rcu Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 5:54 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2009-11-11 6:50 ` David Miller
2009-11-10 18:18 ` [PATCH 00/10] netdev: get rid of read_lock(&dev_base_lock) usages Eric Dumazet
2009-11-10 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-10 18:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-10 18:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091110150617.0e6920f0@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecashin@coraid.com \
--cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).