From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [next-next-2.6] net: configurable device name hash
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911112347.41425.opurdila@ixiacom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111133342.1011e16a@nehalam>
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 23:33:42 you wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:42:35 -0800 (PST)
>
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:38:44 +0200
> >
> > > I don't think we can dynamically size it at boot time since it
> > > depends on the usage pattern which is impossible to determine at
> > > boot time, right?
> >
> > We have no idea how many sockets will be used by the system yet we
> > dynamically size the socket hash tables.
> >
> > Please do some research and see how we handle this elsewhere in the
> > networking.
>
> dcache also sizes hash bits at boot time on available memory.
> See alloc_large_system_hash().
>
Thanks Stephen.
I was actually taking a look at that but I see that the device hash is
allocated per net namespace which means we can't use
alloc_large_system_hash().
We could use a similar function that will work in the per namespace
initialization context, but this might upset net namespace folks since we will
get a large hash for every namespace.
Not sure what can be done to address that problem now except using a boot
parameter to override the defaults. A better solution would be to be able to
use "namespace create" parameters but it appears we don't have this
possibility, yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 19:16 [PATCH] [next-next-2.6] net: configurable device name hash Octavian Purdila
2009-11-11 19:21 ` David Miller
2009-11-11 19:38 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-11 20:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-11 20:32 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-11 20:42 ` David Miller
2009-11-11 21:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-11 21:47 ` Octavian Purdila [this message]
2009-11-11 22:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-12 2:36 ` David Miller
2009-11-12 12:46 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-12 14:09 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911112347.41425.opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--to=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).