From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14586] New: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get through Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:39:13 -0800 Message-ID: <20091112143913.3d89e4f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, harald.dunkel@t-online.de To: Stephen Hemminger , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:59094 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754718AbZKLWjL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:39:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:28:00 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14586 > > Summary: bridge on bonding interface: DHCP replies don't get > through > Product: Networking > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.31.5 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Other > AssignedTo: acme@ghostprotocols.net > ReportedBy: harald.dunkel@t-online.de > Regression: No > > > I would like to run a bridge for kvm on a bonding interface (4 * 1Gbit, Intel > e1000e). Problem: The DHCPDISCOVER packets sent by the guest show up on my dhcp > server as expected, but the DHCPOFFER sent as a reply doesn't reach the guest > behind the bridge. > > Using tcpdump on host and guest I can see the DHCPOFFER on the bond0 and br0 > interface, but it never shows up on vnet0 or on the guest's eth0. > > If I drop the bonding interface and use the host's eth2 for the bridge instead, > then there is no such problem. > > Kernel on host and guest is 2.6.31.5. Attached you can find more information > about my setup. > > I had sent this information to the linux kvm mailing list before, but consensus > was that this is a bridging problem. See > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg25153.html > > There was no reply on the linux bridge mailing list, see > > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2009-November/006749.html