From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:20:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113162050.7469ed84@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911140214.21493.opurdila@ixiacom.com>
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:14:21 +0200
Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 14 November 2009 02:04:45 you wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:20:19 +0200
> >
> > Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com> wrote:
> > > On Friday 13 November 2009 07:01:14 you wrote:
> > > > This patch speeds up the network device name allocation for the case
> > > > where a significant number of devices of the same type are created
> > > > consecutively.
> > > >
> > > > Tests performed on a PPC750 @ 800Mhz machine with per device sysctl
> > > > and sysfs entries disabled:
> > > >
> > > > Without the patch With the patch
> > > >
> > > > real 0m 43.43s real 0m 0.49s
> > > > user 0m 0.00s user 0m 0.00s
> > > > sys 0m 43.43s sys 0m 0.48s
> >
> > Since the main overhead here is building the bitmap table used in the
> > name scan. Why not mantain the bitmap table between calls by
> > implementing a rbtree with prefix -> bitmap.
> > The tree would have to be limited and per namespace but then you
> > could handle the general case of adding a device, then its vlans,
> > then another device, ...
> >
>
> I'll do that !
>
> That was my original intent but I thought it would be too much bloat :) But I
> see your point, even if it is more complex, its more useful.
There might even be a VM notifier hook that could be used to drop the whole
tree if any memory pressure was felt.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 5:01 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 5:20 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 6:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 7:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 9:51 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 22:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 22:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:35 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 23:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:52 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 2:59 ` David Miller
2009-11-14 6:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 22:36 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-15 1:49 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:55 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-11-15 7:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-15 16:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 7:08 ` Benny Amorsen
2009-11-14 7:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-13 9:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 16:40 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-14 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-14 0:14 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-14 0:20 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113162050.7469ed84@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).