From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@lhnet.ca>
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: Mark Smith <lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
shemminger@vyatta.com, opurdila@ixiacom.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:50:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091115165015.GU19478@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911150355.15204.denys@visp.net.lb>
Hi Denys,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 03:55:14AM +0200, Denys Fedoryschenko wrote:
> And interface creation speed is important for me, when electricity goes down
> here, many customers disconnects (up to 500 on single NAS), and then join
> again to NAS. Load average was jumping to sky on such situations, just option
> to not create sysfs entries helped me a lot (was posted recently).
> Electricity outage is usual here, happens 2-3 times daily.
This is exactly the type of scenario I'm looking at. The design of the
Babylon PPP stack is meant to scale somewhat better that pppd. It uses a
single process (although I'm starting to add threads to improve scaling on
SMP systems) for all PPP/L2TP sessions, and has rather lower connection
setup overhead (no fork()/exec() being the biggest one). With udev tuned,
irqbalance disabled and a few other tweaks, it gets >500 connections per
second in startup on a modern 2.6GHz processor for L2TP traffic. There
is PPPoE support, but it needs a bit more work done to scale automatically
(there are a few hardcoded limits in the PPPoE implementation).
-ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-15 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-13 5:01 [net-next-2.6 PATCH] net: fast consecutive name allocation Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 5:20 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 6:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 7:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-13 9:51 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 22:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 22:40 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 22:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:35 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-13 23:39 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-13 23:52 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 2:59 ` David Miller
2009-11-14 6:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-11-14 22:36 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-15 1:49 ` Mark Smith
2009-11-15 1:55 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-11-15 7:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-15 16:50 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2009-11-14 7:08 ` Benny Amorsen
2009-11-14 7:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-14 16:16 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-13 9:55 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-13 16:40 ` Ben Greear
2009-11-14 0:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-11-14 0:14 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-11-14 0:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091115165015.GU19478@kvack.org \
--to=bcrl@lhnet.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=lk-netdev@lk-netdev.nosense.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).