From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] KS8695: fix ks8695_rx() unreasonable action. Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:52:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091116.235200.210617103.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1258383490-13341-1-git-send-email-zeal> <4b016886.16115e0a.355d.ffffca52@mx.google.com> <1258046194.1931.18.camel@myhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zealcook@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ben@simtec.co.uk To: figo1802@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43255 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754335AbZKQHvo (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:51:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1258046194.1931.18.camel@myhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Figo.zhang" Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:16:34 +0800 > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 22:58 +0800, zeal wrote: >> From: zeal >> >> ks8695_rx() will call refill_buffers() for every incoming packet. >> Its not necessary. We just need do it after finishing receiving thing. >> And the 'RX dma engine' is in the same situation. >> This blocks our user space application. The following patch may fix it. >> > > yes, it is right. > > Best, > Figo.zhang > >> Signed-off-by: zeal Patch applied.