Re: [PATCH] net/can: add driver for mscan family & mpc52xx_mscan

From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/can: add driver for mscan family & mpc52xx_mscan
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:12:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091116101205.GA30609@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFFEC2C.6000106-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 599 bytes --]

David,

> >> Taken from socketcan-svn, fixed remaining todos, cleaned up, tested with a
> >> phyCORE-MPC5200B-IO and a custom board.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Applied.
> 
> Unfortunately too early. I will send my review tomorrow. Sorry for the
> delay.

So, I'd assume that I now have to send an incremental patch instead of a V2?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core