From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 2/3] ixgbe: Set MSI-X vectors to NOBALANCING and set affinity Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:28:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091118.222834.01656318.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1258573570.2780.14.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <20091118.115039.41419484.davem@davemloft.net> <1258593299.3103.0.camel@ppwaskie-mobl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bhutchings@solarflare.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, gospo@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:49240 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751129AbZKSG2S (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:28:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1258593299.3103.0.camel@ppwaskie-mobl2> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:14:57 -0800 > We actually just submitted a patch that pairs our Rx queue 0 and Tx > queue 0 (up until the number of queues) onto the same MSI-X > interrupt. Arjan had indicated though he'd still like to make > irqbalance smart enough to distinguish Rx and Tx from one another, > regardless if the drivers just move to queue pairs or not. I don't > care either way, since my queues are now paired. Ok.