From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 5/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1e: implement socket option TCP_COOKIE_TRANSACTIONS Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:49:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091123.094944.125071406.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4B08D967.80003@gmail.com> <1258873848.16503.12.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <4B0A6EF3.8040302@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: joe@perches.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: william.allen.simpson@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36000 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752249AbZKWRt0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:49:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B0A6EF3.8040302@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: William Allen Simpson Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:16:03 -0500 > Therefore, it's plain as can be that this is just more jumping through > arbitrary and capricious hoops that others are not required to follow. Others, like Eric and Ilpo, don't have to jump through these hoops because when they submit patches their code doesn't have coding style issues like your's does. Trust me, it's not about you, and you're not being picked out specifically. These things would be enforced upon anyone. The only unique aspect about you is that you seem to respond to these requirements in the most sour manner possible rather than pleasantly complying and thus getting your changes added to the tree.