From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 2/6] bna: Brocade 10Gb Ethernet device driver Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:22:44 -0800 Message-ID: <20091123202244.56ce6cb5@s6510> References: <200911240351.nAO3p1AY025627@blc-10-10.brocade.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , To: Rasesh Mody Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:56973 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756788AbZKXEWt (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:22:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200911240351.nAO3p1AY025627@blc-10-10.brocade.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:51:01 -0800 Rasesh Mody wrote: > /** > + * bna_uninit() > + * > + * Called by the driver during removal/unload. > + * > + * @param[in] bna_handle - pointer to BNA device structure > + * allocated by the calling driver > + * > + * @return BNA_OK - successful > + * @return BNA_FAIL - failed on sanity checks. > + */ > +enum bna_status_e bna_uninit(void *bna_handle) > +{ > + return BNA_OK; > +} Useless extra bloat?