From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>
Cc: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
andi@lisas.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 14691] New: Complete NAPI IRQ lockup in b44 driver: code fundamentally incompatible with netconsole requirements
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:16:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091125131631.46483ce0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-14691-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:15:33 GMT
bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14691
>
> Summary: Complete NAPI IRQ lockup in b44 driver: code
> fundamentally incompatible with netconsole
> requirements
> Product: Drivers
> Version: 2.5
> Kernel Version: 2.6.32-rc8
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Priority: P1
> Component: Network
> AssignedTo: drivers_network@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: andi@lisas.de
> Regression: No
>
>
> Hi,
>
> severity "blocking" (== "Blocks development and/or testing work"): it's my
> primary window to the world on this router - netconsole - and crashes multiple
> times when loading various drivers, thus for me there's no productive
> proceeding possible, plus there have been multiple reports on this issue since
> at least 2004.
>
> The kernel version I'm testing it on is 2.6.30.9 (OpenWrt MIPSEL, on ASUS
> WL-500gP v2), but since b44 interrupt handler is unchanged I assume it's still
> unfixed.
>
> Frequently when doing some medium activity such as loading modules such as
> ftdi_sio, usb_audio etc. (especially with kobject debugging enabled), the
> network LED starts blinking like crazy and when re-listening to netconsole
> output, there's simply a flood of
> %s: Error, poll already scheduled
> and the box is DEAD (again! *curse*).
>
> Productive debugging of multiple USB and ftdi_sio issues is simply impossible
> with this kind of problem remaining.
>
> See also:
> "RE:hostname freeze" (2004!!):
> http://lists.linuxcoding.com/rhl/2004/msg51048.html
>
> "b44 driver suspend/resume (was Re: [ACPI] Re: Re: various problems with Acer
> TM654, suspend, ACAD, radeon)":
> http://osdir.com/ml/network.general/2004-08/msg00208.html
>
> "acpi and b44: irq disabled, b44: Error, poll already scheduled" (2004!!):
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0408.3/0078.html
>
> And a very related fix and long discussion is at:
> "[PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts":
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2009/5/23/5791863
>
> I'm very uncertain whether the interrupt handler method of simply screaming
> this error message on every interrupt without doing any actual remedies is a
> good idea.
> HAH! Now I've got it: the fact that we're on netconsole means that this error
> message gets sent _immediately_ (out to the netconsole device!!), thus this
> very network transmission encounters an IRQ handler at a time where the
> previous scheduled NAPI processing had no chance yet of being done, thus
> napi_schedule_prep() FAIL, thus error message again, thus... ad nauseam!
> Or, IOW, now I'm _certain_ that it is _NOT_ a good idea to scream this message
> on every IRQ without doing anything about it.
>
>
> I want to report this issue now to make sure it can get the attention it
> deserves, but for now I'll try to come up with a bandaid locally (simply
> silencing the error message) in order to be able to debug the other driver
> issues mentioned above.
>
> Thanks!
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-14691-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-11-25 21:16 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-11-30 19:39 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 14691] New: Complete NAPI IRQ lockup in b44 driver: code fundamentally incompatible with netconsole requirements Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091125131631.46483ce0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).