netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:01:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091126130153.GA3697@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259227989.32372.32.camel@johannes.local>

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:33:09AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:10 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> > net/wireless/wext.c between commit
> > 9fed059667d35fca9288460106e92dbb8ba35ea1 ("WE: Fix set events not
> > propagated") from the  tree and commit
> > 3d23e349d807177eaf519d444677cee86b1a04cf ("wext: refactor") from the net
> > tree.
> > 
> > The latter deleted the file that the former modified.  I just ignored the
> > wireless-current change and removed the file (which seems to have been
> > done in the latter change anyway).
> 
> The fix should probably have gone to wext-core.c instead?

Yes.  That's the way I did it in the merge-test branch of wireless-next-2.6.

Thanks,

John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-26 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-26  3:10 linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26  9:33 ` Johannes Berg
2009-11-26 13:01   ` John W. Linville [this message]
2009-11-30 16:48     ` Jean Tourrilhes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-01  1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-01 14:06 ` John W. Linville
2009-12-28 22:54 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-28 23:41 ` John W. Linville
2010-01-06  2:25 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-07  2:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-09  2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-09  3:20 ` John W. Linville
2010-02-15  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-15  6:22 ` David Miller
2010-02-15  7:16   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-30  2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-30 13:12 ` John W. Linville
2010-03-30 13:51   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-12  2:15 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-12 16:15 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-13  1:02   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-02 23:45 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-28  4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-28 14:57 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-07-06  2:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-06 11:07 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-09-27  2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 13:09 ` John W. Linville
2011-09-27 14:41   ` wwguy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091126130153.GA3697@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).