From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:42:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20091127224206.GA3350@ami.dom.local> References: <81bfc67a0911232217n41b9ac02w3b7770b789e5d209@mail.gmail.com> <20091124111946.GA7883@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911250606k1ec76354n217da9ca20b3517c@mail.gmail.com> <20091125191105.GA3167@ami.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911271007o1fb8f8c2vdd36e8585280e4da@mail.gmail.com> <20091127213640.GA2611@ami.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911271435g4106652bpe8c9ea07893d0ebd@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Frans Pop , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Kirsher , Jesse Brandeburg , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Caleb Cushing Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0911271435g4106652bpe8c9ea07893d0ebd@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:35:34PM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > I doubt bisecting is a good idea with so unpredictable bug. First, you > > should make sure it's not a hardware problem, so go back to the kernel > > you trust most, and give it a really long try with a few recompilations > > after slightly changing the config. Btw, I wonder if you tried e1000e > > module parameters like IntMode=0 or 1. > > no, how do I set those? modprobe -r e1000e modprobe e1000e IntMode=0 Jarek P.