From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] sk_nulls_next_rcu
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:19:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912010219.29340.opurdila@ixiacom.com> (raw)
I am trying to convert the LLC code to RCU, and it appears that for proc
support a sk_nulls_next_rcu would be required.
Is this the wrong way to do it, or is it that nobody need it yet?
Thanks,
tavi
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 3f1a480..989d7e9 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -351,6 +351,13 @@ static inline struct sock *sk_nulls_next(const struct sock *sk)
NULL;
}
+static inline struct sock *sk_nulls_next_rcu(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ struct hlist_nulls_node *n = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_nulls_node.next);
+ return !is_a_nulls(n) ? hlist_nulls_entry(n, struct sock, sk_nulls_node) :
+ NULL;
+}
+
static inline int sk_unhashed(const struct sock *sk)
{
return hlist_unhashed(&sk->sk_node);
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_proc.c b/net/llc/llc_proc.c
index be47ac4..7567fb9 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_proc.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_proc.c
@@ -34,19 +34,19 @@ static struct sock *llc_get_sk_idx(loff_t pos)
{
struct list_head *sap_entry;
struct llc_sap *sap;
- struct hlist_node *node;
+ struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
struct sock *sk = NULL;
list_for_each(sap_entry, &llc_sap_list) {
sap = list_entry(sap_entry, struct llc_sap, node);
- read_lock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
- sk_for_each(sk, node, &sap->sk_list.list) {
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &sap->sk_list.list) {
if (!pos)
goto found;
--pos;
}
- read_unlock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
sk = NULL;
found:
@@ -73,25 +73,25 @@ static void *llc_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
goto out;
}
sk = v;
- next = sk_next(sk);
+ next = sk_nulls_next(sk);
if (next) {
sk = next;
goto out;
}
llc = llc_sk(sk);
sap = llc->sap;
- read_unlock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
sk = NULL;
for (;;) {
+ struct hlist_nulls_node *node;
+
if (sap->node.next == &llc_sap_list)
break;
sap = list_entry(sap->node.next, struct llc_sap, node);
- read_lock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
- if (!hlist_empty(&sap->sk_list.list)) {
- sk = sk_head(&sap->sk_list.list);
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, node, &sap->sk_list.list)
break;
- }
- read_unlock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
out:
return sk;
@@ -99,13 +99,8 @@ out:
static void llc_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
- if (v && v != SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
- struct sock *sk = v;
- struct llc_sock *llc = llc_sk(sk);
- struct llc_sap *sap = llc->sap;
-
- read_unlock_bh(&sap->sk_list.lock);
- }
+ if (v && v != SEQ_START_TOKEN)
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
read_unlock_bh(&llc_sap_list_lock);
}
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-01 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 0:19 Octavian Purdila [this message]
2009-12-01 0:24 ` [RFC] sk_nulls_next_rcu David Miller
2009-12-01 0:32 ` Octavian Purdila
2009-12-01 3:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-01 0:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-12-03 22:47 ` Octavian Purdila
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912010219.29340.opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--to=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).