From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: linux-next: net/kbuild trees build failure Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:28:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20091207222853.GE18939@tuxdriver.com> References: <20091207200317.57820f0a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091207114158.GA2428@merkur.ravnborg.org> <4B1CF39A.5050806@suse.cz> <20091207160903.GB18939@tuxdriver.com> <1260209537.4653.778.camel@rc-desk> <4B1D76B1.6070601@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: reinette chatre , Sam Ravnborg , Stephen Rothwell , David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: Michal Marek Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B1D76B1.6070601@suse.cz> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:42:09PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: > reinette chatre napsal(a): > > Right - could we please use the solution that works at compile time? I > > used UTS_RELEASE after learning about its use in init/version.c, would > > that not make it an approved solution? > > It seems there is some misunderstanding. Alright, if Stephen's fix is acceptable then your suggestion is fine. Sam seemed to suggest that Stephen's fix was a stop-gap. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.