From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Isaacson Subject: Re: 2.6.32 regression, hard lock Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:42:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20091208004221.GA15968@hexapodia.org> References: <20091206141419.GA6195@linux-m68k.org> <20091207143057.53c6a362.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Richard Zidlicky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from straum.hexapodia.org ([64.81.70.185]:36059 "EHLO straum.hexapodia.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965184AbZLHAmP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:42:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091207143057.53c6a362.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:30:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > btw, why does your kernel say "To Be Filled By O.E.M." in the traces? > The kernel.org kernel doesn't do that. Is that kernel patched at all? That's traditional for DMI_PRODUCT_NAME in dodgy vendor BIOSes. I routinely see it on Intel evaluation boards and less frequently on Taiwanese Brand X boards. -andy