* Re: nfs broken in net-next? -- now in mainline
@ 2009-12-09 20:34 Yinghai Lu
2009-12-10 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2009-12-09 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Suresh Jayaraman, Ingo Molnar, Linus Torvalds
Cc: David Miller, Linux Kernel Mailing List, NetDev
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote:
>> On 10/29/2009 01:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> pk12-3214-189-102:~ # mount -t nfs 10.6.75.100:/data/shared/pxeboot /x
>>> mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
>>> mount.nfs: Either use '-o nolock' to keep locks local, or start statd.
>>
>> rpc.statd on client should have be started by mount.nfs when a nfs
>> filesystem is mounted. Is this not happening for some reason or do you
>> see any errors in syslog?
>>
>>>
>>> using opensuse11.1
>>>
>>
>> Are you using 11.1 betas? I know of a problem where non-root user mounts
>> fail to start rpc.statd in betas that got fixed later:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=122748525624094&w=2
>>
>> Is the problem seen only recently (after updating to net-next)?
>>
>
> only happen with net-next.
>
> linus tree and tip tree are ok.
>
Finally it reached linus tree and tip.
YH
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: nfs broken in net-next? -- now in mainline
2009-12-09 20:34 nfs broken in net-next? -- now in mainline Yinghai Lu
@ 2009-12-10 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-12-10 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman, Linus Torvalds, David Miller,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, NetDev
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote:
> >> On 10/29/2009 01:43 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>> pk12-3214-189-102:~ # mount -t nfs 10.6.75.100:/data/shared/pxeboot /x
> >>> mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking.
> >>> mount.nfs: Either use '-o nolock' to keep locks local, or start statd.
> >>
> >> rpc.statd on client should have be started by mount.nfs when a nfs
> >> filesystem is mounted. Is this not happening for some reason or do you
> >> see any errors in syslog?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> using opensuse11.1
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are you using 11.1 betas? I know of a problem where non-root user mounts
> >> fail to start rpc.statd in betas that got fixed later:
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=122748525624094&w=2
> >>
> >> Is the problem seen only recently (after updating to net-next)?
> >>
> >
> > only happen with net-next.
> >
> > linus tree and tip tree are ok.
> >
>
> Finally it reached linus tree and tip.
In the quoted text above it's being disputed that it's a kernel
regression so i guess your best option is to bisect it (if you can).
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-10 7:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-09 20:34 nfs broken in net-next? -- now in mainline Yinghai Lu
2009-12-10 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).