From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Badness at net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:293 Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:45:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091213.234530.82029083.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20091212.010340.227842186.davem@davemloft.net> <4B2360BF.5000102@gmail.com> <4B25D38F.1090702@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lists@nerdbynature.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53753 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751440AbZLNHp3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:45:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B25D38F.1090702@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:56:31 +0100 > It seems to me tcp_create_openreq_child() doesnt properly initialize > newtp->cookie_values to NULL, but this should not produce warnings like that ? If oldtp->cookie_values is NULL, the child's should be as well because of sk_clone().