netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Subject: virtio: Add unused buffers detach from vring
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:47:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091215184740.GD25724@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260902573.4387.76.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:42:53AM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> I submit one split patch for review to make sure that's the right format.
> I copied Rusty's comment for the commit message, and change destroy
> to detach since we destroy the buffers in caller. This patch is built
> against Dave's net-next tree.

Almost :) text not intended for git commit logs like the above
should go after ---, this way git am knows to skip it.

> There's currently no way for a virtio driver to ask for unused
> buffers, so it has to keep a list itself to reclaim them at shutdown.
> This is redundant, since virtio_ring stores that information.  So
> add a new hook to do this: virtio_net will be the first user.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com> 
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/virtio.h       |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index fbd2ecd..f847bc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,29 @@ static bool vring_enable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/* This function is used to return vring unused buffers to caller for free */
> +static void *vring_detach_bufs(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> +{
> +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	START_USE(vq);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < vq->vring.num; ++i) {

This is a single statement loop, so you do not need {}
around it. Or even better:
	for (i = 0; i < vq->vring.num; ++i) {
		if (!vq->data[i])
			continue;
		...
	}
which has less nesting.

> +		if (vq->data[i]) {
> +			/* detach_buf clears data, so grab it now. */

You wrote that comment, but did you read it :)

> +			detach_buf(vq, i);
> +			END_USE(vq);
> +			return vq->data[i];

In fact, this will return NULL always, won't it?

> +		}
> +	}
> +	/* That should have freed everything. */
> +	BUG_ON(vq->num_free != vq->vring.num);
> +
> +	END_USE(vq);
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
>  {
>  	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> @@ -360,6 +383,7 @@ static struct virtqueue_ops vring_vq_ops = {
>  	.kick = vring_kick,
>  	.disable_cb = vring_disable_cb,
>  	.enable_cb = vring_enable_cb,
> +	.detach_bufs = vring_detach_bufs,
>  };
>  
>  struct virtqueue *vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int num,
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
> index 057a2e0..d7da456 100644
> --- a/include/linux/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct virtqueue_ops {
>  
>  	void (*disable_cb)(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  	bool (*enable_cb)(struct virtqueue *vq);
> +	void *(*detach_bufs)(struct virtqueue *vq);
>  };


Please add documentation in virtio.h
Thanks!

>  
>  /**
> 
> Thanks
> Shirley

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-15 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20  6:09 [PATCH 0/1] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio_net Shirley Ma
2009-11-23  0:53 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-23  8:51   ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-12-08 12:21   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-11 12:28     ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Shirley Ma
2009-12-11 12:33       ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Defer skb allocation -- add destroy buffers function for virtio Shirley Ma
2009-12-13 10:26         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14 20:08           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-14 20:22             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14 23:22               ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 10:57                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 22:36               ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-15 22:40                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16  5:04                   ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14  3:25         ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:09           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-11 12:43       ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Defer skb allocation -- new skb_set calls & chain pages in virtio_net Shirley Ma
2009-12-13 11:24         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14 21:23           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 11:21             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14  6:54         ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-14 22:10           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-11 12:46       ` PATCH v2 3/4] Defer skb allocation -- new recvbuf alloc & receive calls Shirley Ma
2009-12-13 11:43         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14 22:08           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15  0:37             ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 11:33             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 16:25               ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 16:39                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 18:42                   ` [RFC PATCH] Subject: virtio: Add unused buffers detach from vring Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 18:47                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-12-15 19:08                       ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 19:14                       ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-15 21:14                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-11 12:49       ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Defer skb allocation -- change allocation & receiving in recv path Shirley Ma
2009-12-13 11:08         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15  8:43           ` Shirley Ma
2009-12-13 10:19       ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Defer skb allocation for both mergeable buffers and big packets in virtio_net Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-14 19:59         ` Shirley Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091215184740.GD25724@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mashirle@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).