netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with vhost-net
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:38 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912162315.38802.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091216025331.GA13935@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:23:31 pm Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:11:40PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 
> >    Thanks for the hint.  They seem to use NAPI for xmit cleanup, so that's
> > what we should do?  I'll try, but such a rewrite doesn't belong in 2.6.32.
> 
> Well it depends.  Real drivers can't touch the hardware so they're
> stuck with whatever the hardware does.  For virtio we do have the
> flexibility of modifying the backend.
> 
> Having said that, for existing backends that will signal when there
> is just a single free entry on the queue something like NAPI could
> reduce the overhead associated with the IRQs.

OK, this is unfortunately untested, but wanted to send it out tonight:

virtio_net: use NAPI for xmit (UNTESTED)

This is closer to the way tg3 and ixgbe do it: use the NAPI framework to
free transmitted packets.  It neatens things a little as well.

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ struct virtnet_info
 	struct napi_struct napi;
 	unsigned int status;
 
+	/* We free packets and decide whether to restart xmit here. */
+	struct napi_struct xmit_napi;
+
 	/* Number of input buffers, and max we've ever had. */
 	unsigned int num, max;
 
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ struct virtnet_info
 	struct sk_buff_head recv;
 	struct sk_buff_head send;
 
+	/* Capacity left in xmit queue. */
+	unsigned int capacity;
+
 	/* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
 	struct delayed_work refill;
 
@@ -111,11 +117,8 @@ static void skb_xmit_done(struct virtque
 {
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = svq->vdev->priv;
 
-	/* Suppress further interrupts. */
-	svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(svq);
-
 	/* We were probably waiting for more output buffers. */
-	netif_wake_queue(vi->dev);
+	napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
 }
 
 static void receive_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -446,7 +449,7 @@ static unsigned int free_old_xmit_skbs(s
 
 	while ((skb = vi->svq->vq_ops->get_buf(vi->svq, &len)) != NULL) {
 		pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
-		__skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
+		skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
 		vi->dev->stats.tx_bytes += skb->len;
 		vi->dev->stats.tx_packets++;
 		tot_sgs += skb_vnet_hdr(skb)->num_sg;
@@ -455,6 +458,23 @@ static unsigned int free_old_xmit_skbs(s
 	return tot_sgs;
 }
 
+static int virtnet_xmit_poll(struct napi_struct *xmit_napi, int budget)
+{
+	struct virtnet_info *vi =
+		container_of(xmit_napi, struct virtnet_info, xmit_napi);
+
+	if (netif_queue_stopped(vi->dev)) {
+		vi->capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
+		if (vi->capacity >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
+			/* Suppress further xmit interrupts. */
+			vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
+			napi_complete(xmit_napi);
+			netif_wake_queue(vi->dev);
+		}
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
+
 static int xmit_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct scatterlist sg[2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS];
@@ -509,34 +529,22 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	int capacity;
 
-again:
-	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
-	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
-
 	/* Try to transmit */
+	skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
 	capacity = xmit_skb(vi, skb);
 
 	/* This can happen with OOM and indirect buffers. */
 	if (unlikely(capacity < 0)) {
+		skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
 		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Unexpected full queue\n");
-		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq))) {
-			vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
-			netif_start_queue(dev);
-			goto again;
-		}
+		/* If we missed an interrupt, we let virtnet_xmit_poll deal. */
+		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq)))
+			napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
 		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
 	}
 	vi->svq->vq_ops->kick(vi->svq);
-
-	/*
-	 * Put new one in send queue.  You'd expect we'd need this before
-	 * xmit_skb calls add_buf(), since the callback can be triggered
-	 * immediately after that.  But since the callback just triggers
-	 * another call back here, normal network xmit locking prevents the
-	 * race.
-	 */
-	__skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
+	vi->capacity = capacity;
 
 	/* Don't wait up for transmitted skbs to be freed. */
 	skb_orphan(skb);
@@ -544,15 +552,16 @@ again:
 
 	/* Apparently nice girls don't return TX_BUSY; stop the queue
 	 * before it gets out of hand.  Naturally, this wastes entries. */
-	if (capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
-		netif_stop_queue(dev);
-		if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq))) {
-			/* More just got used, free them then recheck. */
-			capacity += free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
-			if (capacity >= 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS) {
-				netif_start_queue(dev);
-				vi->svq->vq_ops->disable_cb(vi->svq);
-			}
+	if (unlikely(capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
+		/* Free old skbs; might make more capacity. */
+		vi->capacity = capacity + free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
+		if (unlikely(vi->capacity < 2+MAX_SKB_FRAGS)) {
+			/* Make sure virtnet_xmit_poll sees updated capacity */
+			wmb();
+			netif_stop_queue(dev);
+			/* Missed xmit irq? virtnet_xmit_poll will deal. */
+			if (unlikely(!vi->svq->vq_ops->enable_cb(vi->svq)))
+				napi_schedule(&vi->xmit_napi);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -590,6 +599,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 
 	napi_enable(&vi->napi);
+	napi_enable(&vi->xmit_napi);
 
 	/* If all buffers were filled by other side before we napi_enabled, we
 	 * won't get another interrupt, so process any outstanding packets
@@ -652,6 +662,7 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_devi
 	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 
 	napi_disable(&vi->napi);
+	napi_disable(&vi->xmit_napi);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -883,6 +894,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_d
 	/* Set up our device-specific information */
 	vi = netdev_priv(dev);
 	netif_napi_add(dev, &vi->napi, virtnet_poll, napi_weight);
+	netif_napi_add(dev, &vi->xmit_napi, virtnet_xmit_poll, 64);
 	vi->dev = dev;
 	vi->vdev = vdev;
 	vdev->priv = vi;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-16 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-08 22:50 [RFC PATCH] Regression in linux 2.6.32 virtio_net seen with vhost-net Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-13 12:25 ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-13 23:40   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-15 14:42     ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-15 16:26       ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-16  1:21         ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-15 23:32       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16  1:58         ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-16  4:37         ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 10:37           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16  2:41   ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16  2:53     ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-16 12:45       ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-12-16 13:22         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16 13:35           ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-16 13:38             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-16 13:48               ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17  2:02           ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-17  9:25             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-12-18  1:55               ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-16 13:30         ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17  1:43         ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17  3:12           ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17  5:02             ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17  3:15           ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17  5:05             ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17  6:28               ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17  6:45                 ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17 10:03                   ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 11:27                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-17 11:45                       ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 11:49                         ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 12:08                           ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 12:27                             ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 12:42                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-17 12:56                                 ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 13:22                                   ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 13:04                                 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 13:44                               ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 14:35                                 ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 14:36                                   ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 21:50                                     ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17 22:28                                       ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17 22:41                                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-18 13:46                                       ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-18 19:13                                       ` Sridhar Samudrala
2009-12-17 11:59                         ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 12:19                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-17 11:56                       ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 13:17                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-12-17 14:10                           ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 14:16                             ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-16 17:42     ` Sridhar Samudrala
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-17 11:20 Krishna Kumar
2009-12-17 19:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
     [not found] <20091217111219.9809.27432.sendpatchset@krkumar2.in.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <20091217123153.GA31131@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-12-17 12:56   ` Krishna Kumar2
2009-12-17 13:40     ` Herbert Xu
2009-12-17 13:56       ` Krishna Kumar2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912162315.38802.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).