From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/6] enic: Bug fix: try harder to fill Rx ring on skb allocation failures
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:14:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091220061438.GA12552@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C752BE07.1B019%scofeldm@cisco.com>
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 05:29:43PM -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
> On 12/19/09 5:15 PM, "Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:39:03PM -0800, Scott Feldman wrote:
> >>>> + rq_work_done = rq_work_to_do;
> >>>
> >>> Is it intentional for rq_work_done = rq_work_to_do to become the
> >>> return value?
> >>
> >> That was intentional. If the replacement skb allocation fails, we're
> >> returning like we did a full budget's worth of work so we stay scheduled and
> >> hopefully the next polling pass we'll get the allocations. Before this fix,
> >> there is a corner case which isn't covered: if hw has used all descs and
> >> gens an intr and we get into polling and the replacement alloc fails, then
> >> Rx is hung. Hw is desc starved and we're not going to get any more intrs:
> >> game over.
> >
> > Ok, understood. Though doesn't this fix just narrow the scope for that
> > failure? It seems that it could still occur in a pathological case.
>
> Oh! The intention was to fix it absolutely. Please expand on the
> pathological case your thinking about. We need this 100% solved, but now
> you've got me worried... ;)
Perhaps I am misunderstanding the problem, but what if the budget in
net_rx_action() is exhausted before a call to enic_poll*() successfully
allocs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-20 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-19 2:09 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241 Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH 1/6] enic: Bug fix: use safe queue shutdown in dev->stop Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 15:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-12-19 20:44 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH 2/6] enic: Bug fix: try harder to fill Rx ring on skb allocation failures Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 10:41 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-19 20:39 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-20 1:15 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-20 1:29 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-20 6:14 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2009-12-20 1:51 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-20 6:54 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-19 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH 3/6] enic: minimize pkt filter updates to firmware Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:09 ` [net-next PATCH 4/6] enic: Bug fix: align desc ring sizes to 32 descs Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 2:10 ` [net-next PATCH 5/6] enic: feature add: add ethtool -c/C support Scott Feldman
2009-12-19 10:10 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-19 19:33 ` Scott Feldman
2009-12-20 1:15 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-19 2:10 ` [net-next PATCH 6/6] enic: whitespace cleanup; #define cleanup; more verbose err msg Scott Feldman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-22 2:21 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241a Scott Feldman
2009-12-22 2:21 ` [net-next PATCH 2/6] enic: Bug fix: try harder to fill Rx ring on skb allocation failures Scott Feldman
2009-12-23 23:27 [net-next PATCH 0/6] enic: updates to version 1.1.0.241a Scott Feldman
2009-12-23 23:27 ` [net-next PATCH 2/6] enic: Bug fix: try harder to fill Rx ring on skb allocation failures Scott Feldman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091220061438.GA12552@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scofeldm@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).