From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:22:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20091222072213.GY4490@redhat.com> References: <4B1D4F29.8020309@gmail.com> <20091218215107.GA14946@elte.hu> <4B2F9582.5000002@gmail.com> <4B2F978D.7010602@redhat.com> <4B2F9C85.7070202@gmail.com> <4B2FA42F.3070408@codemonkey.ws> <4B2FA655.6030205@gmail.com> <4B2FAE7B.9030005@codemonkey.ws> <4B2FB3F1.5080808@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Anthony Liguori , Avi Kivity , Ingo Molnar , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2FB3F1.5080808@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:44:17PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote: > > They should be relatively rare > > because obtaining good receive batching is pretty easy. > > Batching is poor mans throughput (its easy when you dont care about > latency), so we generally avoid as much as possible. > > > Considering > > these are lightweight exits (on the order of 1-2us), > > APIC EOIs on x86 are MMIO based, so they are generally much heavier than > that. I measure at least 4-5us just for the MMIO exit on my Woodcrest, > never mind executing the locking/apic-emulation code. > With x2apic EOIs are not MMIO any longer. -- Gleb.