From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:14:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20091223121431.GF20539@basil.fritz.box> References: <4B1D4F29.8020309@gmail.com> <87637zdy9g.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4B30E654.40702@codemonkey.ws> <200912221701.56840.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4B30F214.80206@codemonkey.ws> <20091223065129.GA19600@elte.hu> <20091223101340.GC20539@basil.fritz.box> <4B31EF65.6070000@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , Anthony Liguori , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Gregory Haskins , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B31EF65.6070000@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/summit/cwright_11_open_source_virt.pdf > > See slide 32. This is without vhost-net. Thanks. Do you also have latency numbers? It seems like there's definitely still potential for improvement with messages <4K. But for the large messages they indeed look rather good. It's unclear what message size the Alacrity numbers used, but I presume it was rather large. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.