From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] AlacrityVM guest drivers for 2.6.33 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:10:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20091223171052.GI20539@basil.fritz.box> References: <4B1D4F29.8020309@gmail.com> <87637zdy9g.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <4B30E654.40702@codemonkey.ws> <200912221701.56840.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4B30F214.80206@codemonkey.ws> <20091223065129.GA19600@elte.hu> <4B3248F9.5030504@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , Anthony Liguori , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Andi Kleen , Avi Kivity , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" To: Gregory Haskins Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B3248F9.5030504@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > And its moot, anyway, as I have already retracted my one outstanding > pull request based on Linus' observation. So at this time, I am not > advocating _anything_ for upstream inclusion. And I am contemplating > _never_ doing so again. It's not worth _this_. That certainly sounds like the wrong reaction. Out of tree drivers are typically a pain to use. And upstream submission is not always like this! -Andi